Number: 14904098
Country: Germany
Source: TED
Legal Assistance within the Framework of the European PRACE-6IP-project
PRACE, the Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe, is established as an international not-for-profit association under Belgian law (association internationale sans but lucrative – AISBL) and has its seat in Brussels. PRACE AISBL has 26 members and its mission is to enable high-impact scientific discovery and engineering research and development across all disciplines to enhance European competitiveness for the benefit of society. PRACE seeks to realise this mission by offering world-class computing and data management resources and services through a peer review process. In order to fulfill its mission, PRACE AISBL is supported by the 6th PRACE Implementation Phase (PRACE-6IP) Project, coordinated by one of PRACE AISBL’s members, the Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH.
The requests of this tender are for, in the context of providing support to Work Package 2 of the PRACE-6IP Project:
1) Expert advice on the legal and fiscal questions for the PRACE Implementation Phase projects and fo
Fiscal Law
Lot 1: Fiscal Law
The selected law firm must provide expertise in tax-related issues for the AIBSL.
In particular, the selected law firm must be able to analyse the impact of VAT:
— on the income and expenditure of the AISBL, at the level of the AISBL, but especially at the level of the European partners,
— on a possible evolution of the governance of the AISBL.
In addition, the selected law firm must be able to propose ways of optimising local taxation.
In addition, the selected law firm must be able to answer any tax-related questions resulting from changes in the AISBL structure or its members, changes in funding or sources of funding (e.g. European Commission funding) or changes in the way computing time is allocated.
The selected law firm must be able to answer questions relating to a potential situation where PRACE AISBL purchases its own equipment, especially as regards to:
— insurance of the equipment,
— taxation of allocation of resources,
— potential considerations of state aid.
Additionally, the selected firm must be able to answer questions regarding financial and legal topics related to the participation of PRACE AISBL in projects funded by the European Commission, with a special attention to the H2020 framework programme and its future continuations. More specifically, the selected firm must have expertise and be able to advice on the implementation of grants (in cash or in kind) by PRACE AISBL. E.g.: fellowships, awards, trophies, allowances.
Trade Law/NICT
Lot 2: Trade Law/NICT
The selected law firm will be in charge of providing expertise in the following areas:
— commercial law: sale and purchase,
— implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27.4.2016).
Corporate Law
Lot 3: Corporate Law
The selected law firm must provide expertise in issues relating to the governance of PRACE AISBL, both from a national point of view (especially from Belgium, but not limited to it) and from a European point of view. Additionally, the firm must provide expertise and solutions towards a potential evolution of the AISBL structure (European company, ERIC, others).
Competition Law/Public Law
Lot 4: Competition Law/Public Law
— application of the rules on competitive tendering: applicable law, procedures, monitoring of legal developments relating to these rules,
— competition law: impact study on the free allocation of computing time to industrial researchers.
Social Law/Labour Law
Lot 5: Social Law/Labour Law
The selected law firm will be in charge of providing expertise in the field of employment law:
— to carry out an audit of current employment contracts and propose changes,
— analysis of the applicable social regulations: collective agreement/branch agreement, implementation of internal regulations, mandatory signage, health regulations, election of staff representatives,
— to propose corrective actions following the social and regulatory analysis of the PRACE AISBL.
As long as an effective award (contract) has not yet been granted, the appeal may be submitted to the body referred to under VI.4.1.
Tenderers are required to complain of non-compliance with the awarding authority referred to under I.1 without delay, before lodging a petition for review. Reference is made to § 160 GWB at this point. Tenderers whose bids are not to be considered are informed prior the awarding of contract according to § 134 GWB.